Primary General Liability · Previous AI estimate · Primary component · Low confidence · evidence changed; reassess · not a package total
Confidence
46 %
AI confidence · guides your review
Core assessment is ready. Loading supporting evidence, pricing, market, and audit details…
The saved worksheet or source facts changed after this risk assessment. Save and reassess the package before relying on this recommendation.
AI underwriting recommendation · advisory
Request more information
The High signals are unresolved structural subcontracted operations, an unconfirmed classification and exposure basis, and absent evidence of subcontractor insurance and contractual risk transfer. The file also has conflicting safety answers, inconsistent subcontract costs, no period-level loss runs, and incomplete source pages. Although the deterministic guideline result is InAppetite and the AQUA ISO GL indication provides a technical anchor, the account cannot be responsibly quoted or bound until the specifically identified information is reconciled.
Submission readinessIncomplete
The file is close to its 2026-09-25 effective date but is not decision-ready. Material source pages are missing or unreadable, the class and exposure basis are unresolved, safety answers conflict, subcontracted cost differs by source, no period-level loss runs were supplied, and underlying GL limits are unconfirmed.
Primary
Refer and hold pending classification, payroll/subcontract-cost reconciliation, structural-operation controls, subcontractor insurance, and loss-run confirmation. The AQUA ISO GL indication is a useful technical anchor, but the submitted class and rating exposure are not yet sufficiently validated for a bindable primary quote.
Excess
Excess coverage is not selected for this review. Attached excess materials do not change the confirmed scope.
Review missing information and broker questions →
Your underwriting judgment governs. Use Record decision to accept, adjust or override this recommendation.
Information gaps13
Conflict themesLoading…
Requirements8
Next actionRequest information
Decision-driving risk signals
High · Classification and exposure basis are unresolved
Hold pricing and final terms pending confirmation of the correct class, residential/commercial scope, direct labor payroll, and applicable exposure basis.
High · Structural subcontracted work has severe loss potential
Do not quote or bind until structural-work responsibilities and controls are confirmed; refer for senior review if the insured assumes design or engineering responsibility.
High · Subcontractor insurance and contractual risk transfer are not evidenced
Require documented subcontractor insurance and contractual controls before bind; inadequate subcontractor insurance could materially increase the insured's rated and retained exposure.
Moderate · No period-level loss runs supplied
Treat the account as having insufficient loss data rather than as a verified clean record; obtain signed loss runs or equivalent carrier confirmation before final action.
Moderate · Safety-program answers conflict
Resolve the discrepancy and obtain evidence of the actual safety program before relying on it in appetite or pricing.
What needs resolving
1 item blocks a quote.
0% reviewed · 0 of 13
Also read before you decide
Risk assessment
Overview Account-level risk viewCarpentry · Load Bearing Beam Masters LLC is a McKinney, Texas structural framing general contractor focused on load-bearing wall removals and beam installations. The submission reports 100% subcontracted construction, with the insured providing supervision only; work mix is reported as 90% residential remodeling/repair and 10% commercial remodeling/repair. The scheduled premises is a 2,200-square-foot owners home office.
Operations: Load Bearing Beam Masters LLC is a McKinney, Texas structural framing general contractor focused on load-bearing wall removals and beam installations. The submission reports 100% subcontracted construction, with the insured providing supervision only; work mix is reported as 90% residential remodeling/repair and 10% commercial remodeling/repair. The scheduled premises is a 2,200-square-foot owners home office.
Overall posture is refer-and-pend, not quote-ready. This is a small account by revenue, but load-bearing wall removal and beam installation create severe structural-failure and completed-operations potential. The 100% subcontracted model shifts frequency and control dependence to subcontractor selection, insurance, supervision, temporary shoring, permitting, and contractual risk transfer, none of which is adequately evidenced. Reported losses are nil for eight years, but no period-level loss runs were supplied, so the history is not experience-rating evidence. The submitted class cells are blank, payroll conflicts with the supplemental “1 Owners” entry, subcontract cost is reported as both $300,000 and $350,000, and safety-program answers conflict. The requested $1,000,000/$2,000,000 primary structure is potentially workable after these items are resolved.
Hazard rationale: The operation has meaningful physical and public-access exposure with severe structural-collapse and completed-operations potential. The grade is elevated rather than severe because the insured reports supervisory-only direct operations and 100% subcontracting, but those controls are not yet independently evidenced.
Material risk signals driving the recommendation
High · Classification and exposure basis are unresolved
The authoritative class basis for 91342 is payroll, but source class-code cells are blank, the operation is reported as 100% subcontracted, and ISO subcontracted-construction alternatives use total subcontract cost. Payroll is reported as $350,000 while the supplemental questionnaire shows “1 Owners.”
Hold pricing and final terms pending confirmation of the correct class, residential/commercial scope, direct labor payroll, and applicable exposure basis.
High · Structural subcontracted work has severe loss potential
The email describes load-bearing wall removals and beam installations with 100% subcontracted work. Engineering, temporary-shoring, permitting, inspection, and subcontractor qualification controls are not evidenced.
Do not quote or bind until structural-work responsibilities and controls are confirmed; refer for senior review if the insured assumes design or engineering responsibility.
High · Subcontractor insurance and contractual risk transfer are not evidenced
The insured reports 100% subcontracted work, but no subcontractor certificates, limits, additional-insured wording, indemnity agreements, or monitoring procedures were supplied.
Require documented subcontractor insurance and contractual controls before bind; inadequate subcontractor insurance could materially increase the insured's rated and retained exposure.
Moderate · No period-level loss runs supplied
The application reports no losses, claims, or suits in the past eight years, but no carrier loss-run periods, valuation dates, claim counts, or incurred amounts were supplied.
Treat the account as having insufficient loss data rather than as a verified clean record; obtain signed loss runs or equivalent carrier confirmation before final action.
Moderate · Safety-program answers conflict
ACORD reports a safety manual and toolbox meetings, while the supplemental response is read as Yes/checked in one place and an ACORD continuation response reports no formal written safety and security policy. The source pages require review.
Resolve the discrepancy and obtain evidence of the actual safety program before relying on it in appetite or pricing.
Moderate · Subcontracted cost is inconsistent
Subcontracted cost is reported as $300,000 on GL Acords.pdf and $350,000 on two supplemental entries.
Reconcile the period and scope before using a cost-based classification or evaluating the extent of outsourced operations.
Moderate · Underlying GL limits are unresolved
The source package states that underlying GL limits conflict and no limit is confirmed. No excess layer is currently selected.
This does not prevent evaluation of the selected primary layer, but any future excess request must be held until the underlying limits, attachment, and tower are confirmed.
Attention Principal hazards and controls6 high-severity findings · controls and gaps6 hazards
Load-bearing wall removal, beam installation, and structural framing Severe severityOperations
Finding status
Severity Severe · Frequency Low
Controls evidenced: The email describes the insured as a structural framing GC focused on load-bearing wall removals and beam installs. The ACORD reports a safety manual and toolbox meetings at project start.
Control gaps: No evidence of engineering responsibility, permits, temporary-shoring procedures, qualified-person review, inspection protocols, project-specific written procedures, or completed-operations controls.
100% subcontracted construction operations High severityOperations
Finding status
Severity High · Frequency Moderate
Controls evidenced: The submission reports 100% subcontracted work and 100% of carpentry subcontracted, with supervisory-only direct operations reported.
Control gaps: No certificates of insurance, required subcontractor limits, additional-insured status, indemnity agreements, qualification standards, or monitoring process were supplied.
Residential remodeling in potentially occupied premises High severityPremises
Finding status
Severity High · Frequency Moderate
Controls evidenced: The supplemental questionnaire reports 90% residential remodeling/repair work.
Control gaps: No evidence of occupant separation, site security, dust/debris controls, protection of existing property, temporary access controls, or procedures for work in occupied homes.
Welding metal brackets and associated hot-work exposure High severityOperations
Finding status
Severity High · Frequency Low
Controls evidenced: The ACORD classification description includes welding metal brackets, and the application answers no to flammables, explosives, or chemicals.
Control gaps: No hot-work permits, fire-watch procedures, combustible-clearance controls, extinguishing equipment, or subcontractor welding qualifications were evidenced.
Potential design, engineering, or professional responsibility Severe severityProfessional
Finding status
Severity Severe · Frequency Low
Controls evidenced: No design or engineering services are described in the submission.
Control gaps: The file does not establish whether the insured selects beams, performs calculations, provides engineering advice, or assumes design responsibility.
Loss signal Loss-run assessmentNot established from period evidence loss trend: InsufficientData · evidence review required2 flags
Account-wide claim count: not reconciled. Review the disclosed claims and each report's coverage and policy period below. A zero-loss report does not establish a loss-free account.
Loss periods supplied Unknownnot stated
Incurred to expiring premium Unknownnot computable
Average incurred per claim Unknownnot computable
Share still in reserve Unknownnot computable
Claim frequency Unknownnot computable
Loss trend Unknownnot established
No period-level loss rows were established for this submission, so no trend can be computed from evidence.
Loss period
Claims
Paid
Reserved
Incurred
No period-level loss rows were established for this submission, so no year-by-year series is asserted.
Each row is one loss period resolved to the named loss-run document and page it was printed on. A period set aside from the trend comparison is named in the computed analysis above.
! Red flags
Moderate No carrier loss runs, valuation dates, claim counts, or incurred amounts were supplied, so the risk cannot be experience-rated.
Low The supplemental questionnaire reports no losses, claims, or suits in the past eight years, but the statement remains unverified without period-level reports.
Interpretation and how this was computed
AI assessment narrative
No period-level loss experience was supplied; the reported eight-year no-loss statement is not a verified clean loss record.
Trend · no period comparison establishedInsufficientData
Years reviewed0
Frequency (AI)Not computable. No claim count or period-level loss rows were supplied.
Severity (AI)Not computable. No paid, reserved, incurred, or claim-level amounts were supplied.
Open-claim concern (AI)No pending claims are reported, but open-claim status is not independently supported by carrier loss runs.
Extraction summary
The ACORD loss-history section is marked none, and the supplemental questionnaire reports no losses, claims, or suits in the past eight years, including no pending claims, known pre-existing claim conditions, faulty-construction accusations, breach-of-contract accusations, or mechanics' liens.
How the computed trend was reached
No period-level loss rows were established for this submission, so no trend can be computed from evidence.
Open questions
No loss history was supplied.
Loss trend not established: No period-level loss rows were established for this submission, so no trend can be computed from evidence.
Claim count has not been established; do not treat it as zero or a claim-free record.
Portfolio context only—not a pricing basis. Comparable bound policies show where Dellwood has written similar class and geography across business units.
No comparable policies were returned.
Portfolio signalUnavailable
Location signal Risk area crime contextSupporting details: Loading…Loading…
Source: BestPlaces. Crime scores are anchored to ACORD premises ZIPs and surrounding ZIPs, grouped by city for easier review. Select a ZIP to open its source page. Context only—not a standalone eligibility rule.
Only ZIPs inside this radius with a crime score are shown.
Selected-radius crime context
No ZIPs with a crime score were found within 2.5 miles of insured ZIP 75072.
Surrounding-area crime contextPortfolio, ZIP, neighborhood, or block context—not evidence of an incident at the premises.
1 finding
Geography
Source-grounded context
Evidence quality
Underwriting use
ZIP 75070, McKinney, TexasZip · Period not established
BestPlaces reports a crime score of 14.40 for ZIP 75070.
At most, this supports confirmation of lighting, access control, site security, and property-management practices; it is not evidence of an event at the insured premises.
This is advisory public context only. It is not a loss run, proof of premises activity, or a standalone eligibility, pricing, or declination factor.
Risk location map2.5-mile radius per premises ZIP · No map points available within 2.5 miles.
AI-identified considerations for and against writing the account. Weigh them with your own judgment.
Favorable factors
The risk is within the deterministic appetite result and has one scheduled location.
Annual gross sales are reported at $700,000, which is small relative to the stated Dellwood casualty-book profile.
The application reports no losses, claims, or suits for eight years, subject to verification.
The ACORD reports a safety manual and toolbox meetings, although the broader safety evidence is inconsistent.
The application reports no foreign products, guarantees or warranties, and no flammable, explosive, or chemical exposure.
Guideline concerns
The printed or reconciled class code 91342 is not supported by populated source class-code cells and may not reflect the ISO treatment of subcontracted construction work.
The operation involves load-bearing structural work with potentially severe completed-operations consequences.
Subcontractor insurance adequacy, contractual risk transfer, engineering responsibility, and project controls are not evidenced.
The effective date is near and the application package is incomplete.
Carrier guideline evaluation
91342 · Carpentry - Not Otherwise Classified — NotEstablished
Review the approved class guidance.
Effect: Human review is required before relying on class authority.
Source: Excess Liability Underwriting Guide by GL Class Code v3.5.25.xlsx; Classification!row 974; version 3.5.25
Coverage and pricing
Worksheet Coverage and pricingPrimary General Liability · Previous AI estimate · Primary component · Low confidence · evidence changed; reassess · not a package totalGL $12,436–$14,923
Selected coverages
GL — Primary
Submitted request: GL; requested layer: Primary. This summarizes the submitted request, not carrier appetite or quote authority.
Submitted terms and coverage assessment
Submitted GL limits
Each occurrence: $1,000,000 · General aggregate: $2,000,000
Damage to rented premises: $50,000 · Medical payments: $5,000 · Deductible: $0
Extracted from the submission. These primary limits are separate from our excess limit and underlying limit.
Schedules and premiums
Review the coverages below, adjust the values, and save.
Primary GL rating · Needs inputs · edit classes and exposuresView classification alternatives and evidence
Underwriter decision required
Classification confirmation scenarios
Excluded from premium total
These ISO GL classes are plausible based on the submitted operations, but the file does not establish the fact that distinguishes them. Confirm the operation and class-compatible exposure before selecting a class or using its premium.
91583AI alternative
Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with building construction, reconstruction, repair or erection - one or two family dwellings
ISO rating basis
Total Cost
Required evidence
total cost
Provisional rate
$3.978
Premium
Pending confirmation and exposure
Why unresolved: The submission reports 90% residential remodeling/repair and 100% subcontracted work. Class 91583 is a supplied alternative for the adequately insured subcontracted portion if the residential work is limited to one- or two-family dwellings. Broker question: confirm whether 91583 applies, confirm the exact annual total subcontracted cost, and confirm subcontractor insurance adequacy. This is an advisory alternative and requires underwriter confirmation.
91585AI alternative
Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with construction, reconstruction, repair or erection of buildings
ISO rating basis
Total Cost
Required evidence
total cost
Provisional rate
$4.614
Premium
Pending confirmation and exposure
Why unresolved: The submission reports 100% subcontracted structural construction and includes both residential and commercial remodeling/repair. Class 91585 is a supplied broader alternative if the work is not confined to one- or two-family dwellings. Broker question: confirm whether 91585 applies, identify the building types and exact annual total subcontracted cost, and confirm subcontractor insurance adequacy. This is an advisory alternative and requires underwriter confirmation; it is not additive to 91583.
91342Submitted option
Carpentry
ISO rating basis
Payroll
Required evidence
annual payroll
Provisional rate
$19.04
Premium
Pending confirmation and exposure
Why unresolved: Correct classification and rating basis, including confirmation of whether 91342, 91583, or 91585 applies.
91583AI alternative
Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with building construction, reconstruction, repair or erection - one or two family dwellings
ISO rating basis
Total Cost
Required evidence
total cost
Provisional rate
$3.978
Premium
Pending confirmation and exposure
Why unresolved: Correct classification and rating basis, including confirmation of whether 91342, 91583, or 91585 applies.
91585AI alternative
Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with construction, reconstruction, repair or erection of buildings
ISO rating basis
Total Cost
Required evidence
total cost
Provisional rate
$4.614
Premium
Pending confirmation and exposure
Why unresolved: Correct classification and rating basis, including confirmation of whether 91342, 91583, or 91585 applies.
AQUA ISO GL rating engine
Rating worksheetReview the populated inputs and edit any value to recalculate.
Recall is available after supporting details finish loading.
Schedule results0 of 5 rated
Total indicated premium$0
Commission17.5% commission
Location
Class
Exposure
Rate
Premium
1
91583 (AI suggested)
Missing: total cost
$3.978
Pending inputs
1
91585 (AI suggested)
Missing: total cost
$4.614
Pending inputs
Account
91342 (AI suggested)
Missing: annual payroll
$19.04
Pending inputs
Account
91583 (AI suggested)
Missing: total cost
$3.978
Pending inputs
Account
91585 (AI suggested)
Missing: total cost
$4.614
Pending inputs
Total indicated premium
$0
Show ISO rating-basis details
Location
Class
ISO rating basis
1
91583 (AI suggested)
Total Cost
1
91585 (AI suggested)
Total Cost
Account
91342 (AI suggested)
Payroll
Account
91583 (AI suggested)
Total Cost
Account
91585 (AI suggested)
Total Cost
5 schedule line(s) require additional information because their class-specific basis or exposure is incomplete.
Technical indications returned by AQUA ISO GL for the source-backed location schedule; subject to underwriter validation.
1 ACORD location(s) and 2 source-backed class/exposure line(s) extracted; 0 technical premium indication(s) produced. Lines are ordered by ACORD location, then class.
No location-level premium indication was produced. The ACORD details remain available for review.
Location 1 · Class not provided Basis: Total Cost · Exposure: not provided · Rate: $3.978
Estimated premium: $0
Location 1 · Class not provided Basis: Total Cost · Exposure: not provided · Rate: $4.614
Estimated premium: $0
Location Account · Class not provided Basis: Payroll · Exposure: not provided · Rate: $19.04
Estimated premium: $0
Location Account · Class not provided Basis: Total Cost · Exposure: not provided · Rate: $3.978
Estimated premium: $0
Location Account · Class not provided Basis: Total Cost · Exposure: not provided · Rate: $4.614
Estimated premium: $0
All monetary amounts are in USD unless noted. Premiums below are separate coverage amounts, before taxes and fees. Unpriced requested coverage still needs review.
Primary General LiabilityGeneral liability · Primary · Account-level coverage
Included
Details · terms, sources and calculationEstimate and confidence
Use an estimate only when its scope matches this line. An account-wide estimate must not be applied to each building separately. Applying it does not include the line or save the worksheet.
Provisional AI estimate — not validated pricing. Resolve the listed issues before using this estimate in a priced worksheet.
Primary General Liability · Primary
$12,436–$14,923 · Low confidence
Provisional AI estimate. Exposure/rate component only. Separately rated exposures and charges require their own reconciled pricing lines; do not assume they are included.
Model pricing rationale — subject to reconciliation
AQUA ISO GL is available and produced an adjusted total of $12,436 using $350,000 payroll, class 91342, territory 006, ZIP 75072, and the requested $1,000,000 each occurrence / $2,000,000 general aggregate / $1,000,000 products-completed operations aggregate structure. An indicative upper bound adds a 20% judgmental allowance for unresolved class, payroll, subcontracting, and safety information; it is not a filed rate or market quote.
Assumptions: $1,000,000 each occurrence; $2,000,000 general aggregate; $1,000,000 products-completed operations aggregate; $1,000,000 personal and advertising injury; $50,000 damage to premises rented; $5,000 medical payments; $0 per-occurrence deductible. The provisional exposure is $350,000 annual payroll, matching the GL Acords.pdf Schedule of Hazards and the reconciled rating input.; Arithmetic: $350,000 / 1,000 x $35.5314285714 = $12,436; $350,000 / 1,000 x $42.6371428571 = $14,923.; AQUA ISO GL returned a 17.5% commission, which is used for this indication.; AQUA ISO GL technical components were $5,772 and $6,664, totaling $12,436 before any underwriting judgmental loading.; The upper bound is an AI-estimated uncertainty allowance and must not be treated as an approved or bindable premium.; The class, payroll basis, $0 deductible, and requested limits require underwriter confirmation before bind.
Needed: Correct ISO class and whether subcontracted construction must be separately rated on total subcontract cost.; Reconciled direct payroll and confirmation of the supplemental “1 Owners” entry.; Reconciled subcontracted cost of $300,000 versus $350,000.; Carrier loss runs or equivalent signed loss confirmation.; Validated pricing is unavailable until classification, compatible exposure and material source conflicts are reconciled. Provisional AI estimates are assumption-based, low-confidence scenarios, not approved or bindable quotes.
Evidence: AQUA ISO GL; GL Acords.pdf; Supp App.pdf
Supporting information · policies, evidence and coverage reviewAdditional coverage reviewⓘ About ancillary coverages
This register checks the selected ancillary coverages for risk conclusions, terms and missing information. To price one, use Add a coverage below, select its name, and review its matching AI estimate. A premium alone does not complete its risk assessment.
Only requested worksheet coverages are listed. An AI premium estimate does not establish that a coverage has been assessed.
No ancillary coverage is selected in this worksheet.
Schedule of underlying insurance · 0 policies
Record the policies beneath the requested excess layer. Their premiums are rating inputs and are not added to our quoted premium. Confirm each coverage component, underlying limit, aggregate, and policy term from the source terms.
View source evidence and review findings
Extraction source review
Needs review · Load Bearing Beam Masters LLC
Compare the submitted values with their source before resolving a review item. Original observations remain available even when the schedule has been consolidated. Correct fields and resolve findings through the existing field and source-conflict review.
Review findings (14)
Review marked answers on Supp App.pdf, page 1. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on Supp App.pdf, page 2. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on Supp App.pdf, page 3. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on Supp App.pdf, page 4. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on Supp App.pdf, page 5. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on GL Acords.pdf, page 1. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on GL Acords.pdf, page 2. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on GL Acords.pdf, page 3. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on GL Acords.pdf, page 6. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on GL Acords.pdf, page 4. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on GL Acords.pdf, page 7. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on GL Acords.pdf, page 8. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Review marked answers on GL Acords.pdf, page 9. Model agreement does not verify checkbox placement; inspect the source before relying on these controls.
Location 1, class : printed hazard identifier is missing.
Location and building evidence (1 source observations)
These are source observations, not a count of physical locations. Different addresses or building identifiers require reconciliation.
Question 11, four largest projects over past five years Prior Works as a Key Employee - 15.000 single family home - Load Bearing wall removal and beam install
Source confirmation pending
CurrentProjectDescription
Load Bearing wall removal and beam install average job 10,000
Question 27 checkbox: Have you been involved or will you or your subcontractors be involved in removal of asbestos, PCB’s or other hazardous materials? No checked
Question 40; No checkbox Will your upcoming work involve the construction of or involvement with new Duplexes, Triplexes, Fourplexes or Patio Homes? No
Question 48a; No checkbox Are there any claims or legal actions pending against any active, inactive or dissolved entities in which you have had a controlling interest? No
Question 48b; No checkbox After inquiry, do you have knowledge of any pre-existing act, omission, event, condition or damage ... that might reasonably be expected to give rise to any future claim or legal action? No
GENERAL INFORMATION, question 3: DO/HAVE PAST, PRESENT OR DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS INVOLVE(D) STORING, TREATING, DISCHARGING, APPLYING, DISPOSING, OR TRANSPORTING OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL? N
GENERAL INFORMATION (continued), question 22: DOES THE BUSINESSES' PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE SAFETY OR SECURITY OF THE PREMISES? N
Inspect marked answer
ResolvedEvidenceScope
The complete supplied document has readable page records beyond this observation window. Specific missing facts and unreadable content remain separate findings.
Unknown source · p. ?
Deterministic package reconciliation The supplied rendered pages are labeled pages 1-3 of a 6-page questionnaire; pages 4-6 were not supplied.
Source confirmation pending
DocumentWindowObservation
Source-page observation (4-6); review alongside the complete submission. All supplied document pages were read. This note alone does not establish that the account is missing the information.
The supplied pages are continuation pages 4-6 of a six-page supplemental questionnaire and do not show applicant identity, mailing address, policy dates, requested limits, or quantitative exposures.
Source confirmation pending
DocumentWindowObservation
Source-page observation (7-7); review alongside the complete submission. All supplied document pages were read. This note alone does not establish that the account is missing the information.
The supplied page contains only an insurance fraud warning notice and does not provide submission, insured, coverage, location, exposure, or loss-history data.
Source confirmation pending
ResolvedEvidenceScope
The complete supplied document has readable page records beyond this observation window. Specific missing facts and unreadable content remain separate findings.
Unknown source · p. ?
Deterministic package reconciliation The supplied document pages are ACORD 125 pages 1-3 of 5; pages 4-5 were not supplied.
Source confirmation pending
DocumentWindowObservation
Source-page observation (1-3); review alongside the complete submission. All supplied document pages were read. This note alone does not establish that the account is missing the information.
No GL limits, deductible, proposed effective date, proposed expiration date, carrier, policy number, or premium is populated on the supplied pages.
Source confirmation pending
DocumentWindowObservation
Source-page observation (4-6); review alongside the complete submission. All supplied document pages were read. This note alone does not establish that the account is missing the information.
Applicant mailing address, policy number, carrier, effective date, NAIC code, classification code, rates, premiums, and deductible are not populated on the supplied pages.
Source confirmation pending
ResolvedEvidenceScope
The complete supplied document has readable page records beyond this observation window. Specific missing facts and unreadable content remain separate findings.
Unknown source · p. ?
Deterministic package reconciliation Only actual source pages 7-9 were supplied; the visible ACORD 126 pages are labeled pages 2-4 of 4, so the first page of the form is not included.
Source confirmation pending
OriginalSubmissionEmailContext
Original email retained verbatim in raw evidence; submitting parties, routing and operational changes require package review.
Unknown source · p. ?
Deterministic package reconciliation --- ORIGINAL SUBMISSION EMAIL ---
From: bsellers@dellwood.com; Received: 2026-09-01T12:20:35.0000000
[A black and blue logo AI-generated content may be incorrect.]
Britt Sellers, CPCU, CRIS, AIM, ASLI, AU
EVP, Head of Brokerage Casualty
bsellers@dellwood.com<mailto:email@dellwood.com>
2500 Northwinds Pkwy, Ste 425
Alpharetta, GA 30009
T: 470-841-8175 (mobile)
www.dellwood.com<http://www.dellwood.com/>
________________________________
From: Joshua Grogan
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2026 6:25 PM
To: Casualty Submissions
Cc: Joshua Grogan; Joseph Thomas; Troy Clark
Subject: Fw: Dellwood Submission - Load Bearing Beam Masters - Eff: 9/25/26
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Hello,
On behalf of Tom Martina tmartina@crcgroup.com<mailto:tmartina@crcgroup.com> please see the attached for clearance.
Load Bearing Beam Masters is a structural framing GC focused on load‑bearing wall removals and beam installs, with 100% subcontracted work; domiciled in McKinney, TX. The following documents are included - Acords/Supplemental.
Please let me know if you need anything else for clearance.
Thank you.
Joshua Grogan | Associate Broker
CRC Group | Team RTP | CA License # 0778135
C | 469-826-0567
E | jgrogan@crcgroup.com<mailto:jgrogan@crcgroup.com>
12377 Merit Dr. Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75251
CRCGroup.com<https://www.crcgroup.com/>
[A red and white logo AI-generated content may be incorrect.]<https://www.crcgroup.com/>
[cid:4ea11b0d-c2f8-4663-b7c8-850f821c82c2]<https://www.crcgroup.com/tools-intel> [A red and black logo Description automatically generated] <https://www.crcgroup.com/Tools-Intel/Latest-Updates/Placing-You-First-Podcast> [cid:f9348d78-a53a-44e8-a10e-e8de6628d86b] <https://www.crcgroup.com/sign-up-for-tools-intel> [cid:136eca6b-bb80-4f81-9a5f-023f2ade7a03] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/163250/>
NOTICE: You cannot bind, alter or cancel coverage without speaking to an authorized representative of CRC Group. Coverage cannot be bound without written confirmation from an authorized representative of CRC Group. This email and any files transmitted with it are not encrypted and may contain privileged or other confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or entity, or believe that you may have received this email in error, please reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received. In addition, you should not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use this information. Thank you.
The information contained in this email (and any attachments hereto) may be confidential. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents (and any attachments hereto), is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently and securely delete/destroy the original and all copies or printouts of the message (and any attachments hereto).
Embedded links: http://www.dellwood.com/ | https://www.crcgroup.com/ | https://www.crcgroup.com/ | https://www.crcgroup.com/ | https://www.crcgroup.com/" | https://www.crcgroup.com/tools-intel | https://www.crcgroup.com/tools-intel" | https://www.crcgroup.com/Tools-Intel/Latest-Updates/Placing-You-First-Podcast | https://www.crcgroup.com/Tools-Intel/Latest-Updates/Placing-You-First-Podcast" | https://www.crcgroup.com/sign-up-for-tools-intel | https://www.crcgroup.com/sign-up-for-tools-intel" | https://www.linkedin.com/company/163250/ | https://www.linkedin.com/company/163250/"
--- LINKED WEB REFERENCES FOUND IN THE EMAIL ---
URL: https://www.crcgroup.com/
HTTP status: 200
Page is larger than the review limit; use the URL only as a lead, not as verified evidence.
URL: https://www.crcgroup.com/tools-intel
HTTP status: 200
Page is larger than the review limit; use the URL only as a lead, not as verified evidence.
URL: https://www.crcgroup.com/Tools-Intel/Latest-Updates/Placing-You-First-Podcast
HTTP status: 200
Page is larger than the review limit; use the URL only as a lead, not as verified evidence.
URL: https://www.crcgroup.com/sign-up-for-tools-intel
HTTP status: 200
Page is larger than the review limit; use the URL only as a lead, not as verified evidence.
URL: https://www.linkedin.com/company/163250/
HTTP status: 999
Page content was not available; use the URL only as a lead, not as verified evidence.
Source confirmation pending
Review checklist and decision
Bring AI questions into this checklist, record responses, and resolve blocking items. This is a review handoff, not a bind action.
Worksheet version history
Follow-up and requirements
Required before bind Subjectivities8 requirements to clear before bind8 outstanding
Confirm the applicable ISO classification and rating basis before bind, including whether the 100% subcontracted construction operations require a separate total-cost classification.The source class cells are blank, the reconciled class is 91342 payroll-rated, and the supplied ISO alternatives treat subcontracted construction on total cost.
Not addressed in package
Provide certificates of insurance, required limits, additional-insured evidence, indemnity agreements, and subcontractor qualification controls for all subcontractors.The insured reports 100% subcontracted work, making subcontractor insurance and contractual risk transfer central to the GL exposure.
Not addressed in package
Reconcile the $300,000 versus $350,000 subcontracted-cost entries and confirm the applicable policy period and exposure scope.The difference affects classification, exposure measurement, and pricing.
Not addressed in package
Confirm actual owner/direct labor duties and annual payroll, including whether the supplemental “1 Owners” entry is a dollar amount, a count, or a transcription error.The payroll-rated AQUA ISO GL indication uses $350,000, but the supplemental payroll entry is inconsistent.
Not addressed in package
Provide a written description of engineering, design, permitting, temporary-shoring, qualified-person review, inspection, and final sign-off procedures for load-bearing wall and beam work.Structural failure is the dominant severity concern and the current file does not establish who assumes design or engineering responsibility.
Not addressed in package
Resolve and evidence the formal safety-program discrepancy, including the actual written safety policy, manual, toolbox-meeting practice, and jobsite enforcement.The supplemental and ACORD responses do not consistently describe the same safety controls.
Not addressed in package
Provide five years of carrier loss runs with valuation dates, or equivalent signed carrier confirmation supporting the reported eight-year no-loss statement.No period-level loss data was supplied, so the account cannot be experience-rated or treated as a verified clean record.
Not addressed in package
Provide the missing and unreadable application pages and confirm that no material operations, class exposures, or coverage requests are omitted.The supplied package is incomplete and includes source-review exceptions affecting material answers.
Not addressed in package
Decision critical Information that changes the decision11 broker questions that could change the decision11 questions
Correct classification and rating basis, including confirmation of whether 91342, 91583, or 91585 applies.
Reconciled direct payroll and owner/employee exposure.
Reconciled subcontracted cost of $300,000 versus $350,000.
Subcontractor certificates, limits, contractual risk transfer, and qualification controls.
Engineering, permitting, shoring, inspection, and hot-work procedures.
Resolution of conflicting formal safety-program answers.
Dated carrier loss runs or equivalent verified no-loss documentation.
Missing and unreadable application pages.
UW confirmation of suggested class 91583 — Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with building construction, reconstruction, repair or erection - one or two family dwellings at location 1, plus total cost; For AI pricing, use only the separately labeled structured estimate, its assumptions and missing information.
UW confirmation of suggested class 91585 — Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with construction, reconstruction, repair or erection of buildings at location 1, plus total cost; For AI pricing, use only the separately labeled structured estimate, its assumptions and missing information.
UW confirmation of suggested class 91342 — Carpentry, plus annual payroll; For AI pricing, use only the separately labeled structured estimate, its assumptions and missing information.
UW confirmation of suggested class 91583 — Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with building construction, reconstruction, repair or erection - one or two family dwellings, plus total cost; For AI pricing, use only the separately labeled structured estimate, its assumptions and missing information.
UW confirmation of suggested class 91585 — Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with construction, reconstruction, repair or erection of buildings, plus total cost; For AI pricing, use only the separately labeled structured estimate, its assumptions and missing information.
Broker questions
High Please confirm whether Load Bearing Beam Masters performs or controls any engineering, structural calculations, design, beam selection, permitting, or temporary-shoring decisions, and identify who performs those functions.Design or engineering responsibility could materially increase severity, affect exclusions, and change the appropriate classification and appetite.
Not addressed in package
High Please provide the subcontractor insurance program: required GL limits, certificates, additional-insured status, written indemnity requirements, and how compliance is monitored before work begins.The operation is reported as 100% subcontracted, so inadequate subcontractor insurance could transfer substantial exposure to the insured.
Not addressed in package
High Please confirm whether the residential work is limited to one- or two-family dwellings and describe the commercial work, including any buildings over four stories.The answer distinguishes the supplied ISO alternatives 91583 and 91585 and determines whether a different construction classification is required.
Not addressed in package
High Please reconcile the $350,000 payroll with the supplemental entry “1 Owners,” and confirm the number of direct employees, owner duties, and expected annual direct payroll.The current AQUA ISO GL indication is payroll-rated, but the source entries do not establish a reliable payroll exposure.
Not addressed in package
High Please reconcile the $300,000 subcontract cost on GL Acords.pdf with the $350,000 subcontract cost on the supplemental questionnaire and identify the applicable period for each.The discrepancy affects a potential total-cost classification and the amount of outsourced work being evaluated.
Not addressed in package
High Please explain the conflicting safety responses and provide the current written safety policy, toolbox-meeting procedure, hot-work controls, and project inspection practices.The file reports both affirmative safety controls and no formal written safety/security policy; underwriting should not rely on an unresolved control representation.
Not addressed in package
High Please provide dated carrier loss runs for the requested five-year period, or carrier-confirmed no-loss documentation showing policy periods, valuation dates, and insured identity.The eight-year no-loss statement is not supported by period-level loss data, leaving frequency, severity, and open-claim status unestablished.
Not addressed in package
Medium Please provide the missing application pages and the unreadable source page identified for review.Those pages may contain material operations, coverage, class, or control information not reflected in the current assessment.
Not addressed in package
High Please confirm whether ISO GL class 91583 — Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with building construction, reconstruction, repair or erection - one or two family dwellings applies at location 1, and provide the total cost required by its authoritative rating basis (Total Cost).The classification can be reviewed now, but a technical premium cannot be calculated until the underwriter confirms the class and the broker supplies its compatible exposure.
Not addressed in package
High Please confirm whether ISO GL class 91585 — Contractors - subcontracted work - in connection with construction, reconstruction, repair or erection of buildings applies at location 1, and provide the total cost required by its authoritative rating basis (Total Cost).The classification can be reviewed now, but a technical premium cannot be calculated until the underwriter confirms the class and the broker supplies its compatible exposure.
Not addressed in package
High Please confirm whether ISO GL class 91342 — Carpentry applies, and provide the annual payroll required by its authoritative rating basis (Payroll).The classification can be reviewed now, but a technical premium cannot be calculated until the underwriter confirms the class and the broker supplies its compatible exposure.
Evidence Assessment references8 material sources cited by the AI assessment8 sources
The insured is a structural framing general contractor focused on load-bearing wall removals and beam installs, with 100% subcontracted work.
Source:
Email · Broker submission body
The ACORD schedule reports $700,000 sales and $350,000 payroll for the scheduled location.
Source:
GL Acords.pdf · page 6 · Schedule of Hazards
The submission reports 100% subcontracted work and $300,000 paid to subcontractors.
Source:
GL Acords.pdf · page 7 · CONTRACTORS
The supplemental questionnaire reports 90% residential remodeling/repair, 10% commercial remodeling/repair, and 100% supervisory-only direct work.
Source:
Supp App.pdf · page 2 · Questions 9-10
AQUA ISO GL used class 91342 on $350,000 payroll with a $12,436 adjusted total.
Source:
AQUA ISO GL · Rating lines
Dellwood class guidance identifies class 91342 as payroll-rated, with premises/operations and products/completed operations authority and maximum hazard grade M.
Source:
Excess Liability Underwriting Guide by GL Class Code v3.5.25.xlsx · Classification!row 974
The account reports no losses, claims, or suits for the past eight years, but the supplied package contains no period-level loss rows.
Source:
Supp App.pdf · Loss history section
BestPlaces returned no score for submitted ZIP 75072 and reports a score of 14.40 for nearby ZIP 75070.
Reference Assessment limitationsEvidence gaps and boundaries of the assessmentRead before bind
The assessment is based on a partial application package and source-backed reconciliation digest. No decision-grade premises incident research was supplied, no public incident is attributed to the insured, and the submitted ZIP 75072 has no BestPlaces score returned. Loss experience is reported as no losses but is not supported by period-level carrier reports. The classification, payroll, subcontracted cost, safety controls, and underlying GL limits remain unresolved. Loss trend InsufficientData: No period-level loss rows were established for this submission, so no trend can be computed from evidence. Validated pricing is unavailable until classification, compatible exposure and material source conflicts are reconciled. Provisional AI estimates are assumption-based, low-confidence scenarios, not approved or bindable quotes.
Current public web research is included in newly generated AI assessments. Re-run enrichment for older submissions to incorporate it.
Record Audit trailSupporting details: Loading…Loading…
Time-stamped record of workflow changes, underwriting actions, correspondence, and AI review activity for this submission.